- •Contents
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •Table of cases
- •Table of statutes
- •Table of statutory instruments
- •Table of treaties
- •Table of EC legislation
- •1 Property law: the issues
- •1.1. Basic definition
- •1.2. Illustrative example
- •1.2.1. John
- •1.2.1.1. The unexcised body cell and the question of ownership
- •1.2.1.2. John’s interest in the excised body cell
- •1.2.1.3. Continuity of interests and John’s interest in the cell line
- •1.2.1.4. Enforceability of John’s interest in the cell line
- •1.2.2. Dr A and Dr B and the acquisition and transmission of property interests
- •1.2.3. The drugs company: constraints on the exercise of property rights
- •Notes and Questions 1.1
- •2 What we mean by ‘property’
- •2.1. Introduction
- •2.1.1. Property as a relationship and as a thing
- •2.1.2. Conceptualising ‘things’
- •2.1.3. Distinguishing property rights from other rights relating to things
- •2.1.4. Rights and other entitlements: Hohfeld’s rights analysis
- •2.1.4.1. Rights and duties, privileges and no-rights
- •2.1.4.2. Privileges and no-rights, and powers and liabilities
- •Abandonment
- •Effect of restrictions on alienation rights
- •2.1.4.3. Powers and liabilities, immunities and disabilities
- •2.1.5. Hohfeldian analysis of dynamic property relationships
- •2.1.5.1. Stage 1: Before the grant of the option
- •2.1.5.2. Stage 2: Grant of the option
- •2.1.5.3. Stage 3: Exercise of the option
- •2.1.6. Property rights, property interests and ownership
- •Notes and Questions 2.1
- •2.2. Private property, communal property, state property and no property
- •2.2.1. Introduction
- •2.2.2.1. No-property: ownerless things
- •2.2.2.2. Open access communal property
- •Distinction between open access and limited access communal property
- •Distinction between open access communal property and no property
- •Distinction between open access communal property and state property
- •Distinction between allocation and provision of resources
- •Regulation of communal property
- •2.2.2.3. Limited access communal property
- •Distinction between communal property and co-ownership
- •Particular use rights rather than general use rights
- •2.2.2.4. State property
- •2.2.2.5. Anticommons property
- •2.3. Economic analysis of property rights
- •2.3.1. What economic analysis seeks to achieve
- •Notes and Questions 2.2
- •2.3.2. Key concepts in the economic analysis of property rights
- •2.3.2.1. Externalities
- •2.3.2.2. Transaction costs
- •Imperfect information
- •Costs of collective action
- •Free-riders and holdouts
- •2.3.2.3. Efficiency
- •Value
- •Pareto efficiency
- •Kaldor-Hicks efficiency
- •2.4. Things as thing and things as wealth
- •2.4.1. Functions of things
- •2.4.2. The idea of a fund
- •2.4.3. Thing versus wealth
- •2.4.4. Related conceptions
- •2.4.4.1. Fungibles and non-fungibles
- •2.4.4.2. ‘Use value’ and ‘exchange value’
- •2.4.4.3. Property and personhood
- •Use value/exchange value
- •A functional distinction
- •Notes and Questions 2.3
- •3 Justifications for property rights
- •3.1. Introduction: general and specific justifications
- •3.2. Economic justification of property rights
- •3.2.1. Property and scarcity
- •Notes and Questions 3.1
- •3.2.2. Viability of single property systems
- •3.2.3. Criteria for measuring the success of a particular form of ownership
- •3.3. John Locke’s justification for private property
- •3.3.1. What Locke was attempting to establish
- •3.3.2. The political context
- •3.3.3. The problem of consent
- •3.3.4. Locke’s justification for original acquisition
- •3.3.5. The nature of Locke’s commons
- •3.3.6. Why mixing labour with a thing should give rise to entitlement
- •3.3.7. The sufficiency proviso
- •3.3.8. The spoilation proviso
- •3.3.9. The theological dimension to Locke’s theory
- •3.3.10. Present relevance of Locke’s theory
- •Notes and Questions 3.2
- •4 Allocating property rights
- •4.1. Introduction
- •4.2. The first occupancy rule
- •4.2.1. Intuitive ordering
- •4.2.2. Preservation of public order
- •4.2.3. Simplicity
- •4.2.4. Signalling
- •4.2.5. The bond between person and possessions
- •4.2.6. The libertarian justification
- •4.2.7. The communitarian objection
- •4.2.8. Economic efficiency
- •Notes and Questions 4.1
- •4.3. New things
- •Notes and Questions 4.2
- •4.4. Capture
- •Notes and Questions 4.3
- •5.2. Iron-holds-the-whale
- •5.3. Split ownership
- •4.5. Colonisation and property rights
- •4.5.1. Introduction
- •4.5.2. The Milirrpum decision and the doctrine of terra nullius
- •4.5.3. Mabo (No. 2)
- •4.5.3.1. Terra nullius
- •4.5.3.2. Property, sovereignty and the doctrine of radical title
- •4.5.3.3. Extinguishment
- •Express extinguishment
- •Implied extinguishment by inconsistent grant
- •Abandonment
- •Surrender but not alienation
- •Notes and Questions 4.4
- •4.5.4. Developments since Mabo (No. 2)
- •5 Personal and proprietary interests
- •5.1. Characteristics of proprietary interests
- •5.1.1. General enforceability
- •5.1.2. Identifiability of subject-matter
- •5.1.2.1. The basic principle
- •5.1.2.2. Fluctuating assets
- •5.1.3. Significance of alienability
- •5.1.3.1. Inalienability of communal property
- •5.1.3.2. Status rights
- •5.1.3.3. Appurtenant rights
- •5.1.4. Requirement for certainty
- •5.1.5. The numerus clausus of property interests
- •5.1.6. Vindication of property rights
- •5.1.7. Termination
- •5.1.7.1. Abandonment
- •5.1.7.2. Disclaimer
- •5.1.7.3. Forfeiture
- •5.1.8. Property rights and insolvency
- •5.2. Special features of communal property rights
- •5.2.1. Present scope of communal property
- •5.2.1.1. Rights of common
- •5.2.1.2. Customary rights
- •Notes and Questions 5.1
- •5.3. Aboriginal land rights
- •5.3.1. Nature of native title
- •5.3.2. Alienability
- •5.3.3. Abandonment
- •5.3.4. Variation
- •5.3.5. Extent of native title
- •5.3.6. Is native title proprietary?
- •5.3.6.1. Blackburn J’s view in Milirrpum
- •5.3.6.2. The view of the High Court in Mabo (No. 2)
- •5.3.6.3. The Canadian view
- •Notes and Questions 5.2
- •6 Ownership
- •6.1. The nature of ownership
- •6.1.1. The basis of ownership
- •6.1.1.1. Ownership and people
- •6.1.1.2. Ownership and things
- •6.1.2. An outline of the difficulties encountered in any consideration of ownership
- •6.1.2.1. The different meanings of ownership
- •6.1.2.2. Disagreements about ownership
- •6.1.2.3. Contradictions within ownership
- •6.1.2.4. The division of ownership
- •Between different types of owner
- •Between owners and non-owners
- •Notes and Questions 6.1
- •Notes and Questions 6.2
- •6.2. The contents of ownership
- •Notes and Questions 6.3
- •Notes and Questions 6.4
- •6.3. The roles played by ownership
- •6.3.1. As a legal term of art
- •6.3.1.1. Ownership’s role in land
- •6.3.1.2. Ownership’s role in chattels
- •6.3.1.3. Ownership’s role in legislation
- •6.3.2. As an amorphous notion
- •6.3.2.1. Ownership as an organising idea
- •6.3.2.2. Ownership as a contested concept
- •6.4. The limitations of ownership
- •6.4.1. Nuisance
- •6.4.1.1. A brief introduction to nuisance
- •Public nuisance
- •Private nuisance
- •6.4.1.2. The requirements of private nuisance
- •6.4.1.3. Private nuisance and private property
- •What is protected?
- •6.4.1.4. The allocation of entitlements
- •The traditional criteria
- •The role of the market
- •The role of public policy
- •6.4.1.5. The protection of entitlements
- •Property rules
- •Liability rules
- •Rules of inalienability
- •Notes and Questions 6.5
- •Notes and Questions 6.6
- •Notes and Questions 6.7
- •Notes and Questions 6.8
- •Notes and Questions 6.9
- •A. Property and liability rules
- •B. Inalienable entitlements
- •Notes and Questions 6.10
- •6.5. Restrictive covenants
- •Notes and Questions 6.11
- •Notes and Questions 6.12
- •7 Possession
- •7.1. The nature of possession
- •7.1.1. Introduction
- •7.1.2. Possession, ownership and proprietary interests
- •7.1.3. What is possession?
- •7.1.3.1. Factual control
- •The relevance of title
- •The nature of the thing possessed
- •The purpose for which the thing is used
- •Control through agents and control of contents
- •7.1.3.2. Intention required
- •Intention to exclude
- •Effect of ignorance
- •Notes and Questions 7.1
- •7.2. Possession of land
- •7.2.1. Leases and licences
- •7.2.1.1. Why the distinction matters
- •7.2.1.2. Distinguishing leases from licences
- •Notes and Questions 7.2
- •7.2.2. Possession and particular use rights
- •7.2.2.1. General and particular use rights
- •7.2.2.2. Compatibility of particular and general use rights
- •7.3. Possession of goods: bailment
- •7.3.1. Nature of bailment
- •7.3.2. Rights, duties and obligations of bailor and bailee
- •7.4. Protection of possession
- •7.4.1. Protection of property rights by protection of possession
- •7.4.2. Tort and the protection of property rights
- •7.4.2.1. The role of tort in the protection of property rights
- •7.4.2.2. Scope of the property torts
- •Conversion
- •What amounts to a conversion of goods?
- •Remedies
- •Trespass
- •What amounts to trespass
- •Remedies
- •7.4.3. Self-help remedies
- •7.4.3.1. Survival of self-help remedies
- •7.4.3.2. Restrictions and deterrents
- •7.4.4. Unlawful eviction and harassment
- •7.4.5. Trespassing and the criminal law
- •Notes and Questions 7.3
- •8 Fragmentation of ownership
- •8.1. Introduction
- •8.2. Present and future interests
- •8.2.1. Interests in possession, in reversion and in remainder
- •8.2.2. Absolute entitlements, contingent entitlements and mere expectancies
- •8.2.2.1. Absolute entitlements
- •8.2.2.2. Contingent interests and expectancies
- •8.2.2.3. Alternative contingencies
- •8.2.3. When interests vest
- •8.2.4. Alienation, management and control
- •8.2.5. Interests of contingent duration
- •8.2.5.1. Determinable interests
- •8.2.5.2. Interests subject to a condition subsequent
- •8.2.5.3. Distinguishing determinable and forfeitable interests
- •8.2.6. Requirement of certainty
- •8.2.7. Successive interests in land and the doctrine of tenures and estates
- •8.2.7.1. Tenures and estates
- •8.2.7.2. Estates in particular use rights
- •8.2.7.3. Leases
- •8.2.8. Restrictions on the power to create future interests
- •8.3. Legal and equitable interests
- •8.3.1. Origin of the legal/equitable distinction
- •8.3.1.1. Failed formality interests
- •8.3.1.2. Novel interests
- •8.3.2. Legal and equitable interests now
- •8.3.2.1. Interests in land
- •8.3.2.2. Interests in goods
- •8.3.3. The significance of the legal/equitable distinction
- •8.3.4. Three common fallacies
- •8.3.4.1. Equitable interests and beneficial interests
- •8.3.4.2. Over-identification of equitable interests with trusts
- •8.3.4.3. Absolute ownership does not include equitable beneficial ownership
- •Notes and Questions 8.1
- •8.4. Fragmentation of management, control and benefit
- •8.4.1. Corporate property holding
- •8.4.2. Managerial property holding
- •8.4.2.1. Trust
- •The trustee
- •The settlor
- •The beneficiaries
- •8.4.2.2. Administration of property on death
- •8.4.2.3. Bankruptcy and liquidation
- •Notes and Questions 8.2
- •8.5. Group ownership
- •8.6. General and particular use rights
- •Notes and Questions 8.3
- •9 Recognition of new property interests
- •9.1. Why are certain interests regarded as property?
- •9.1.1. The function of property
- •9.1.1.1. As a means of allocating scarce resources
- •9.1.1.2. As an incentive to promote their management
- •9.1.1.3. As a moral, philosophical or political statement
- •9.1.2. The danger of property
- •9.1.3. The requirements of property
- •9.2. The dynamic nature of property
- •9.2.1. The recognition and limits of the covenant as a proprietary interest
- •Notes and Questions 9.1
- •9.2.2. The recognition of a proprietary right to occupy the matrimonial home
- •Notes and Questions 9.2
- •9.3. The general reluctance to recognise new property rights
- •9.3.1. The facts of Victoria Park Racing v. Taylor
- •9.3.2. The views of the majority
- •9.3.3. The views of the minority
- •9.3.4. The significance of the case
- •Notes and Questions 9.3
- •9.4. A comparative confirmation and an economic critique
- •Notes and Questions 9.4
- •9.5. The future of property
- •9.5.1. The new property thesis
- •Notes and Questions 9.5
- •Notes and Questions 9.6
- •10 Title
- •10.1. What we mean by ‘title’
- •10.2. Acquiring title: derivative and original acquisition of title
- •10.2.1. Derivative acquisition: disposition or grant
- •10.2.2. Original acquisition
- •10.3. Relativity of title
- •10.4. Proving title
- •10.4.1. Role of registration
- •10.4.2. Possession as a root of title
- •10.4.3. Provenance
- •10.4.4. Extinguishing title by limitation of action rules
- •10.4.5. Relativity of title and the ius tertii
- •10.5. The nemo dat rule
- •10.5.1. Scope of the nemo dat rule
- •10.5.2. General principles applicable to all property
- •10.5.2.1. Registration and the nemo dat rule
- •10.5.2.2. Dispositions to volunteers
- •10.5.2.3. Powers of sale
- •10.5.3. The application of the nemo dat rule to goods
- •10.5.4. The application of the nemo dat rule to money
- •10.5.5. The application of the nemo dat rule to land
- •10.5.5.1. The general principle
- •10.5.5.2. After-acquired property
- •10.5.5.3. Interests by estoppel
- •10.6. Legal and equitable title
- •11 Acquiring title by possession
- •11.1. Introduction
- •11.2. The operation of adverse possession rules
- •11.2.1. Unregistered land
- •11.2.2. Registered land
- •11.2.3. What counts as ‘adverse’ possession
- •11.2.4. Effect on third party interests
- •11.3. Why established possession should defeat the paper owner
- •11.4. Adverse possession and registration
- •11.5. Good faith and the adverse possessor
- •1. Tension between principle and proof
- •Notes and Questions 11.1
- •A. Lockean entitlement
- •B. Utilitarianism
- •C. Property and personhood
- •B. Property theory and adverse possession
- •Notes and Questions 11.2
- •Notes and Questions 11.3
- •Stale claims in registered land
- •Stale claims under the 2002 Act
- •Distinguishing the ‘good’ squatter from the ‘bad’ squatter
- •Problems of proof
- •Effect of the 2002 Act changes on the incidence of adverse possession
- •The incompatibility argument
- •Notes and Questions 11.4
- •11.6. Goods
- •11.6.1. Taking and theft
- •11.6.2. Protection of title by tort
- •11.6.3. The Limitation Act 1980 and title to goods
- •11.6.4. Finders
- •Notes and Questions 11.5
- •12 Transfer and grant
- •12.1. Derivative acquisition
- •12.2. Formalities
- •12.2.1. Nature and content of formalities rules
- •12.2.2. Registration and electronic transactions
- •12.2.3. Validity and enforceability against third parties
- •12.2.4. Effect of compliance on passing of title
- •12.2.5. Transactions excepted from formalities rules
- •12.2.5.1. Equitable modification of legal rules
- •12.2.5.2. Implied rights
- •12.2.5.3. Rights acquired by possession or prescription
- •12.2.6. Deeds and prescribed forms
- •12.2.7. Why have formalities rules
- •12.2.7.1. The evidentiary function
- •12.2.7.2. The cautionary function
- •12.2.7.3. The channelling function
- •12.2.7.4. Other functions
- •Clarifying terms
- •Publicity
- •State functions
- •12.2.8. Disadvantages
- •12.2.8.1. Hard cases
- •12.2.8.2. Costs
- •Notes and Questions 12.1
- •Notes and Questions 12.2
- •12.3. Contractual rights to property interests
- •12.3.1. Estate contracts and the rule in Walsh v. Lonsdale
- •12.3.2. Application to property other than land
- •12.3.3. The failed formalities rule
- •12.3.3.1. The general rule
- •12.3.3.2. The failed formalities rule as it applies to land
- •12.3.3.3. Failed formalities rule as it applies to other property
- •Notes and Questions 12.3
- •Notes and Questions 12.4
- •12.3.4. Options to purchase, rights of pre-emption and rights of first refusal
- •Notes and Questions 12.5
- •Notes and Questions 12.6
- •12.4. Unascertained property
- •12.4.1. The problem of identification
- •12.4.2. Unascertained goods
- •12.4.3. Other unascertained property
- •Notes and Questions 12.7
- •13 Acquiring interests by other methods
- •13.1. Introduction
- •13.2. The difference between adverse possession and prescription
- •13.3. Why long use should give rise to entitlement
- •13.4. Rationale
- •13.4.1. Ascendancy of the presumed grant rationale
- •13.4.2. Effect of the ‘revolting fiction’
- •13.5. When long use gives rise to a prescriptive right
- •13.5.1. The problem of negative uses
- •13.5.2. Rights that can be granted but not acquired by prescription
- •13.6. User as of right and the problem of acquiescence
- •13.7. The future of prescription
- •Recommendation in favour of abolition
- •Minority view in favour of retention
- •Notes and Questions 13.1
- •14 Enforceability and priority of interests
- •14.1. Rationale of enforceability and priority rules
- •14.2. Enforceability and priority rules
- •14.2.1. The basic rules
- •14.2.2. Impact of registration
- •Notes and Questions 14.1
- •14.3. The doctrine of notice
- •14.3.1. Notice
- •14.3.2. Good faith
- •14.3.3. Effectiveness of the doctrine of notice as an enforceability rule
- •Notes and Questions 14.2
- •14.4. Overreaching
- •14.4.1. Nature and scope of overreaching
- •14.4.2. Operation of overreaching
- •14.4.3. Overreaching the interests of occupying beneficiaries
- •14.4.4. Transactions capable of overreaching beneficiaries’ interests
- •14.4.5. The two-trustees rule
- •Introductory
- •Overreaching
- •Safeguard for beneficiaries
- •Change of circumstances
- •Protecting occupation of property
- •Principal recommendation
- •Notes and Questions 14.3
- •15 Registration
- •15.1. What are registration systems for?
- •15.2. Characteristics of the English land registration system
- •15.2.1. Privacy
- •15.2.2. Comprehensiveness
- •15.2.3. Boundaries
- •15.2.4. Restricted class of registrable interests
- •15.2.4.1. Distinguishing ‘substantive’ registration and ‘protection’ on the register
- •15.2.4.2. Registration
- •15.2.4.3. ‘Protection’ by notice or restriction
- •15.2.4.4. The overriding interest class
- •15.2.5. The mirror, curtain and guarantee principles
- •THE ‘MIRROR PRINCIPLE’
- •THE ‘CURTAIN PRINCIPLE’
- •15.2.6. Consequences of non-registration
- •Notes and Questions 15.1
- •Compulsory use of electronic conveyancing
- •Do-it-yourself conveyancing
- •The objective of the power
- •The application of the power
- •Notes and Questions 15.2
- •15.3. Enforceability and priority of interests under the Land Registration Act 2002
- •15.3.1. Registrable interests
- •15.3.2. All other interests
- •15.3.2.1. Enforceability
- •15.3.2.2. Priority
- •15.4. Overriding interests
- •15.4.1. Justifications for overriding interests
- •15.4.2. Principles to be applied
- •15.4.3. Overriding interests under the 2002 Act
- •15.4.4. Easements and profits
- •15.4.5. Interests of persons in actual occupation: the 1925 Act
- •15.4.5.1. What rights are covered?
- •5.4.5.2. Actual occupation
- •Physical presence
- •Personal occupation
- •Non-residential premises
- •15.4.6. Interests of persons in actual occupation: the 2002 Act
- •15.4.6.1. Causal link between interest and occupation
- •15.4.6.2. Meaning of ‘actual occupation’
- •15.4.6.3. The ‘notice’ element
- •15.4.6.4. Can minors be in actual occupation?
- •15.4.6.5. Occupation of part
- •15.4.7. Complexity
- •Notes and Questions 15.3
- •15.5. Indemnity
- •15.5.1. Function of indemnity
- •15.5.2. Shortfall in the provision of indemnity
- •15.5.3. Cost
- •17 Leases and bailment
- •17.1. Introduction
- •17.2. Leases and bailments compared
- •17.2.1. Consensuality
- •17.2.2. Contract
- •17.2.3. Enforcement
- •17.2.4. Duration and purpose
- •17.2.5. Beneficial use
- •17.2.6. Proprietary status
- •17.2.7. Inherent obligations of the possessor
- •17.3. Leases
- •17.3.1. Nature of the lease
- •17.3.1.1. Duration: the four basic categories
- •The legal position
- •Length of fixed-term leases in practice
- •Commonhold as an alternative to the long residential lease
- •Commercial premises
- •Assignment and premature termination of fixed-term lease
- •17.3.1.3. Periodic tenancies
- •Nature
- •Contractual fetters on notice to quit
- •17.3.1.4. Tenancy at will
- •Tenancy at sufferance
- •Notes and Questions 17.1
- •17.3.1.5. Certainty of duration
- •Notes and Questions 17.2
- •Passage 2
- •Passage 3
- •Passage 4
- •Notes and Questions 17.3
- •17.3.1.7. The tolerated trespasser status
- •Notes and Questions 17.4
- •Notes and Questions 17.5
- •17.3.2. Alienability
- •17.3.2.1. Inherent alienability
- •Alienability of tenant’s interest
- •Subleases and other derivative interests granted by the tenant
- •Effect of termination of lease on derivative interests
- •Alienability of landlord’s interest
- •Concurrent leases and other derivative interests granted by the landlord
- •17.3.2.2. Restrictions on alienability
- •17.3.2.3. Statutory control of contractual restrictions
- •Notes and Questions 17.6
- •17.3.3. Effect of alienation on enforceability
- •17.3.3.1. Introduction: the basic principle
- •Automatic transmission of benefit and burden of proprietary terms: the privity of estate principle
- •Post-assignment liability: the privity of contract principle
- •17.3.3.3. Derivative interest holders
- •17.4. Bailment
- •17.4.1. Essential features of bailment
- •17.4.2. Categories of bailment
- •17.4.3. Characteristics of bailment
- •17.4.4. Liabilities of the bailee
- •Notes and Questions 17.7
- •17.4.5. Is bailment proprietary?
- •17.4.5.1. Possession and exclusivity
- •17.4.5.2. Alienability
- •17.4.5.3. Enforceability against third parties
- •17.4.5.4. Other proprietary indicia
- •18 Security interests
- •18.1. The nature and function of security
- •18.1.1. Nature of security
- •18.1.1.1. Terminology problems
- •18.1.1.2. Legal and equitable rights to redeem
- •18.1.1.3. Creation, attachment and perfection of security
- •18.1.2. Function
- •18.1.2.1. Right of first recourse
- •18.1.2.2. Attachment to the asset
- •18.1.2.4. The hostage function
- •18.1.2.5. Signalling, monitoring and control
- •18.1.3. Efficiency
- •18.1.4. Use of security
- •18.2. Forms of security
- •18.2.1. Property transfer securities: the mortgage
- •18.2.2. Possessory securities: pledge or pawn
- •18.2.3. Hypothecations: the charge
- •18.2.4. Liens
- •18.2.5. Property retention securities
- •18.2.6. Charge by way of legal mortgage
- •Notes and Questions 18.1
- •18.3. Control over the terms of the relationship
- •18.3.1. Equitable supervisory jurisdiction
- •18.3.2. The Kreglinger principles
- •18.3.3. Statutory intervention
- •Notes and Questions 18.2
- •18.4. Enforcement of security
- •18.4.1. Remedies
- •18.4.2. Possession
- •18.4.3. Sale
- •18.4.3.1. When the power arises
- •18.4.3.2. When the power becomes exercisable
- •18.4.4. Duties on enforcement
- •General principles
- •The handling of arrears: initial action taken by lenders
- •Alleviating arrears problems
- •The levying of charges on accounts in arrear
- •Methods of obtaining possession
- •Proceeds of sale
- •Indemnity insurance
- •Loss recovery procedures
- •Notes and Questions 18.3
- •16 Co-ownership
- •16.1. Introduction
- •16.2.1. Basic concepts
- •OWNERSHIP IN COMMON
- •JOINT OWNERSHIP
- •CONCURRENT INTERESTS IN FINANCIAL ASSETS
- •CONCURRENT INTERESTS IN LAND
- •Notes and Questions 16.1
- •Unity of possession
- •Unity of interest
- •Unity of title
- •Unity of time
- •16.2.2. A comparison of joint tenancies and tenancies in common
- •16.2.2.1. Four unities versus one
- •Notes and Questions 16.2
- •16.2.2.2. The right of survivorship (and how to avoid it)
- •Severance at common law
- •16.2.2.3. Acting upon one’s share
- •16.2.2.4. Mutual agreement
- •16.2.2.5. Mutual conduct
- •16.2.2.6. Statutory severance
- •Notes and Questions 16.3
- •16.2.3. Use of co-owned property
- •16.2.3.1. Land
- •12 THE RIGHT TO OCCUPY
- •13 EXCLUSION AND RESTRICTION OF RIGHT TO OCCUPY
- •Notes and Questions 16.4
- •16.2.3.2. Chattels
- •Notes and Questions 16.5
- •16.2.4. Sale and other dispositions of co-owned property
- •16.2.4.1. Land
- •Notes and Questions 16.6
- •16.2.4.2. Chattels
- •16.3. Other forms of co-ownership
- •16.3.1. Commonhold
- •16.3.2. Unincorporated associations
- •Notes and Questions 16.7
- •16.3.3. Extending the limits of co-ownership: public trusts
- •Bibliography
- •Index
Bibliography
Ackerman, Bruce, Private Property and the Constitution (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1977)
Alexander, Gregory S., Commodity and Propriety: Competing Visions of Property in American Legal Thought 1776–1970 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997)
Anderson, Terry L., and Hill, P. J., ‘The Evolution of Property Rights’, in T. L. Anderson and F. S. McChesney (eds.), Property Rights: Co-operation, Conflict, and Law
(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003), p. 135
Anderson, Terry L., and McChesney, Fred S., Property Rights: Co-operation, Conflict, and Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003)
Ausness, R., ‘Water Rights, the Public Trust Doctrine and the Protection of Instream Uses’ (1986) University of Illinois Law Review 407–37
Ballantine, H. W., ‘Title by Adverse Possession’ (1918) 32 Harvard Law Review 135 Barnsley, D. G., ‘Co-owners’ Rights to Occupy Trust Property’ (1998) Cambridge Law
Journal 123
Bartlett, Richard, ‘Humpies Not Houses, or the Denial of Native Title: A Comparative Assessment of Australia’s Museum Mentality’ (2003) 10 Australian Property Law Journal 12
Barzel, Yoram, ‘Optimal Timing of Innovations’ (1968) 50 Review of Economics and Statistics 348
Economic Analysis of Property Rights (2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)
Battersby, G., and Preston, A. D., ‘The Concepts of ‘‘Property’’, ‘‘Title’’ and ‘‘Owner’’ Used in the Sale of Goods Act 1893’ (1972) 35 Modern Law Review 268
Beaglehole, Earnest, Property: A Study in Social Psychology (London: Allen & Unwin, 1931)
Becker, Lawrence C., Property Rights: Philosophic Foundations (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1977)
‘The Moral Basis of Property Rights’, in J. Roland Pennock and John Chapman (eds.), Nomos XXII: Property (New York: New York University Press, 1980), Chapter 8
Bell, A. P., Modern Law of Personal Property in England and Ireland (London: Butterworths, 1989)
Bentham, Jeremy, The Theory of Legislation, Principles of the Civil Code (ed. C. K. Ogden, London: Kegan Paul & Co., 1931)
698
Bibliography 699
Berg, Alan, ‘Clogs on the Equity of Redemption – Or Chaining the Unruly Dog’ (2002)
Journal of Business Law 335
Berle, Adolf A., and Means, Gardiner C., The Modern Corporation and Private Property
(New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1932)
Birks, Peter, ‘Five Keys to Land Law’, in S. Bright and J. Dewar (eds.), Land Law: Themes and Perspectives (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), Chapter 18
Blackstone, Sir William, Commentaries on the Laws of England (Chicago and London: Chicago University Press, 1979)
Brennan, Frank, The Wik Debate: Its Impact on Aborigines, Pastoralists and Miners
(Sydney: New South Wales University Press, 1998)
Buckle, Stephen, Natural Law and the Theory of Property: Grotius to Hume (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991)
Buckley, F. H., ‘The Bankruptcy Priority Puzzle’ (1986) 72 Virginia Law Review 1393
Burn, E. H., Cheshire and Burn’s Modern Law of Real Property (16th edn, London: Butterworths, 2000)
Byrne-Sutton, Quentin, ‘The Goldberg Case: A Confirmation of the Difficulty in Acquiring Good Title to Valuable Stolen Cultural Objects’ (1992) 1 International Journal of Cultural Property 151
Calabresi, Guido, and Melamed, A. Douglas, ‘Property Rules, Liability Rules and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral’ (1972) 85 Harvard Law Review 1089
Carsberg, B. V., Page, M. J., Sindall, A. J., and Waring, L. D., Small Company Financial Reporting (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986)
Chakravaty-Kaul, Minoti, Common Lands and Customary Law: Institutional Change in North India Over The Past Two Centuries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996)
Cheffins, Brian, Company Law: Theory, Structure and Operation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997)
Clarke, Alison, ‘Property Law’ (1996) 49 Current Legal Problems 97
‘Ship Mortgages’, in N. Palmer and E. McKendrick (eds.), Interests in Goods (2nd edn, London, Lloyd’s of London Press, 1998)
‘Use, Time and Entitlement’ (2004) 57 Current Legal Problems 239
Coase, R. H., ‘The Problem of Social Cost’ (1960) 3 Journal of Law and Economics 1 Cohen, Felix S., ‘Dialogue on Private Property’ (1954) 9 Rutgers Law Journal 357 Coleman Jules L., and Kraus, Jody, ‘Rethinking the Theory of Legal Rights’ (1986) 95 Yale
Law Journal 1335
Conveyancing and Land Law Committee of the Law Society, Undue Influence – Solicitors’ Duties Post-‘Etridge’ (Guidance Note, May 2002)
Cooter, Robert D., ‘Time, Property Rights, and the Common Law’ (1986) 64 Washington University Law Quarterly 804
Cooter, Robert D., and Ulen, Thomas, Law and Economics (4th edn, Boston: Addison Wesley Longman, 2004)
Cotterrell, R., ‘Some Sociological Aspects of the Controversy Around the Legal Validity of Private Purpose Trusts’, in S. Goldstein (ed.), Equity and Contemporary Legal Developments (Jerusalem: H &M Sacher Institute, 1992)
700Bibliography
Council of Mortgage Lenders, Handling of Arrears and Possessions (Statement of Practice, 1997)
Critchley, Patricia, ‘Taking Formalities Seriously’, in S. Bright and J. K. Dewar (eds.), Land Law: Themes and Perspectives (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), Chapter 20 Cunningham, R. A., ‘More on Adverse Possession: A Rejoinder to Professor Helmholz’
(1986) 64 Washington University Law Quarterly 1167
Cunningham, R. A., Stoebuck, W. B., and Whitman, D. A., The Law of Property (3rd edn, St Paul, MN: West Group, 2000)
Dahlman, Carl, The Open Field System and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980)
Dales, J. H., Pollution Property and Prices: An Essay in Policy-Making and Economics
(Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1968)
Dasgupta, P., and Stiglitz, J., ‘Uncertainty, Industrial Structure, and the Speed of R&D’ (1980) 11 Bell. Journal of Economics 1
De Alessi, Louis, ‘Gains from Private Property’, in T. L. Anderson and F. S. McChesney (eds.), Property Rights: Co-operation, Conflict, and Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003), Chapter 4
De Lacy, J., ‘The Priority Rule of Dearle v. Hall Re-stated’ (1999) Conveyancer 311 Deakin, S., Johnston, A., and Markesinis, B. S. (eds.), Markesinis and Deakin’s Tort Law
(5th edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003)
Demsetz, Harold, ‘Towards a Theory of Property Rights’ (1967) 57 American Economic Review 347
‘Ownership and the Externalities Problem’, in T. L. Anderson and F. S. McChesney (eds.), Property Rights: Co-operation, Conflict, and Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003), Chapter 11
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Good Practice Guide on Managing the Use of Common Land (London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, June 1998)
Dharmapala, Dhammika, and Pitchford, Rohan, ‘An Economic Analysis of ‘‘Riding to Hounds’’: Pierson v. Post Revisited’ (2002) 18 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 39
Diamond, A. L., A Review of Security Interests in Property (London: HMSO, 1989) Director-General of Fair Trading, Guidelines for Lenders on Non-Status Lending (London:
Office of Fair Trading, 1997)
Dixon, Martin, ‘Overreaching and the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996’ (2000) Conveyancer 267
‘The Reform of Property Law and the Land Registration Act 2002: A Risk Assessment’ (2003) Conveyancer 16
Dockray, Martin, ‘Why Do We Need Adverse Possession?’ (1985) Conveyancer 272 Dromgoole, Sarah, and Gaskell, Nicholas, ‘Interests in Wrecks’, in N. Palmer and
E. McKendrick (eds.), Interests in Goods (2nd edn, London: Lloyd’s of London
Press, 1998) Chapter 7
Dunne, Paul, and Hughes, Alan, ‘Age, Size, Growth and Survival: UK Companies in the 1980s’ (1994) 42 Journal of Industrial Economics 115
Bibliography 701
Easterbrook F., and Fischel, D., The Economic Structure of Corporate Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991)
Ellickson, Robert C., ‘Adverse Possession and Perpetuities Law: Two Dents in the Libertarian Model of Property Rights’ (1986) 64 Washington University Law Quarterly 723
‘A Hypothesis of Wealth-Maximising Norms: Evidence from the Whaling Industry’ (1989) 5 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 83
‘Property in Land’ (1993) 102 Yale Law Journal 1315
Epstein, Richard A., ‘Notice and Freedom of Contract in the Law of Servitudes’ (1982) 55 Southern California Law Review 1353
‘Past and Future: The Temporal Dimension in the Law of Property’ (1986) 64 Washington University Law Quarterly 667
Etheleriadis, P., ‘The Analysis of Property Rights’ (1996) 16 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31 Farrand J. T. (ed.), Wolstenholme and Cherry’s Conveyancing Statutes, vol. 1 (13th edn,
London: Oyez Publishing Ltd, 1972)
Farrand, J. T., and Clarke, Alison (eds.), Emmet and Farrand on Title (19th edn, looseleaf, London: Sweet & Maxwell)
Feather J., ‘Authors, Publishers and Politicians: The History of Copyright and the Book Trade’ (1988) 12 European Intellectual Property Review 377
Fennell, Lee Anne, ‘Common Interest Tragedies’ (2004) 98 Northwestern University Law Review 907
Ferris, Graham, and Battersby, Graham, ‘Overreaching and the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 – A Reply to Mr Dixon’ (2001) Conveyancer 221 ‘The Impact of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 on
Purchasers of Registered Land’ (1998) Conveyancer 168
‘The General Principles of Overreaching and the Reforms of 1925’ (2002) 118 Law Quarterly Review 270
Filmer, Sir Robert, Patriarcha and Other Writings (ed. Johann P. Sommerville, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991)
Flathman, Richard E., ‘Impossibility of an Unqualified Disjustificatory Theory’, in J. Roland Pennock and John Chapman (eds.), Nomos XXII: Property (New York: New York University Press, 1980), Chapter 3
Fleming, J., The Law of Torts (8th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1992)
Fox, David, ‘Bona Fide Purchase and the Currency of Money’ (1996) Cambridge Law Journal 547
Fuller, Lon, ‘Form and Consideration’ (1941) 41 Columbia Law Review 799
Furey, Nigel, ‘Goods Leasing and Insolvency’, in N. Palmer and E. McKendrick (eds.), Interests in Goods (2nd edn, London: Lloyd’s of London Press, 1998), p. 787
Gallie, W. B., ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’ (1955–6) 56 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 167
Gardner, Simon, ‘New Angles on Unincorporated Associations’ (1992) Conveyancer 41 Gearty C., ‘The Place of Private Nuisance in a Modern Law of Torts’ (1989) Cambridge
Law Journal 214
702Bibliography
Golinveaux, J., ‘What’s in a Domain Name: Is ‘‘Cybersquatting’’ Trademark Dilution?’ (1999) 33 University of San Francisco Law Review 641
Goode, R. M., ‘Is the Law Too Favourable to Secured Creditors?’ (1983–4) 8 Canadian Business Law Journal 53
Proprietary Rights and Insolvency in Sales Transactions (2nd edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell and Centre for Commercial Law Studies, 1989)
Commercial Law (2nd edn, London: Penguin Books, 1995)
Goodman, M., ‘Adverse Possession of Land – Morality and Motive’ (1970) 33 Modern Law Review 281
Gray, J. C., The Nature and Sources of the Law (ed. D. Campbell and P. Thomas, Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1996)
Gray, K., ‘Property in Thin Air’ (1991) Cambridge Law Journal 252 Elements of Land Law (2nd edn, London: Butterworths, 1993) ‘Equitable Property’ (1995) 48 Current Legal Problems 157
Gray, K., and Gray, S. F., Elements of Land Law (3rd edn, London: Butterworths, 2001) Elements of Land Law (4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)
Grey, Thomas C., ‘The Disintegration of Property’, in J. Roland Pennock and John Chapman (eds.), Nomos XXII: Property (New York: New York University Press, 1980), Chapter 3
Grunebaum, James O., Private Ownership (London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1987)
Hadden, Tom, Company Law and Capitalism (2nd edn, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1977)
Haddock, David, ‘First Possession Versus Optimal Timing: Limiting the Dissipation of Economic Value’ (1986) 64 Washington University Law Quarterly 775
Halstead, P., ‘Human Property Rights’ (2002) Conveyancer 513
Hanbury and Martin, Modern Equity (ed. J. E. Martin, 16th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2001)
Hardin, Garrett, ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’ (1968) 162 Science 1243
Hargreaves, A. D., ‘Review of Modern Real Property’ (1956) 19 Modern Law Review 14
Introduction to the Principles of Land Law (4th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1963) Harpum, Charles, ‘Overreaching, Trustees’ Powers and the Reform of the 1925
Legislation’ (1990) Cambridge Law Journal 277
Harris, J. W., ‘Ownership of Land in English Law’, in N. MacCormick and P. Birks (eds.), The Legal Mind (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986)
Hayton, D. J., Commentary and Cases on the Law of Trusts and Equitable Remedies (11th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2001)
Hayton, D. J., and Marshall, O. R., Cases and Commentary on the Law of Trusts (9th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1991)
Cases and Commentary on the Law of Trusts (10th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1996) Hegel, G. W. F., Philosophy of Right (1821) (trans. with notes by T. M. Knox, Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1945)
Heller, Michael, ‘The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets’ (1998) 111 Harvard Law Review 621
Bibliography 703
Helmholz, R., ‘Adverse Possession and Subjective Intent’ (1983) 61 Washington University Law Quarterly 331
Hill, Jonathan, ‘The Role of the Donee’s Consent in the Law of Gift’ (2001) 117 Law Quarterly Review 127
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb, ‘Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning’ (1913) 23 Yale Law Journal 16
Holdsworth, Sir William, A History of English Law (3rd edn, London: Methuen and Co. Ltd, 1923)
Book Review (1933) 49 Law Quarterly Review 576
Honore´, A. M., ‘Ownership’, in A. M. Honore´, Making Laws Bind (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987)
Hudson, Anthony, ‘Abandonment’, in N. Palmer and E. McKendrick (eds.), Interests in Goods (2nd edn, London: Lloyd’s of London Press, 1998), Chapter 23
Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature (ed. with notes by L. A. Selby-Bigge, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1888)
International Federation of Surveyors, Statement on the Cadastre (International Federation of Surveyors, 1995)
Ireland, Paddy, ‘Company Law and the Myth of Shareholder Ownership’ (1999) 62 Modern Law Review 32
Jackson, T. H., and Kronman, A. T., ‘Secured Financing and Priorities Among Creditors’ (1979) 88 Yale Law Journal 1143
Kohler, Paul, ‘The Whittling Away of Way’ (1992) Conveyancer 354
‘Kentucky Fried Chicken’ (1993) 2 International Journal of Cultural Property 133–45 Kohler, P., and Palmer, N., ‘Information as Property’, in N. Palmer and E. McKendrick (eds.), Interests in Goods (2nd edn, London: Lloyd’s of London Press, 1998)
Kramer, Matthew H., John Locke and the Origins of Private Property: Philosophical Explorations of Individualism, Community, and Equality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)
Land Registry, Annual Report and Accounts 2002–2003 Adverse Possession (Practice Guide No. 4, March 2003)
Defining the Service: E-conveyancing (July 2004)
Law Commission, Interim Report on Distress for Rent (Law Commission Report No. 5, 1966)
Transfer of Land: Appurtenant Rights (Law Commission Consultative Document No. 36, 1971)
Transfer of Land: Land Registration (Second Paper) (Law Commission Consultative Document No. 37, 1971)
Transfer of Land: The Law of Positive and Restrictive Covenants (Law Commission Report No. 127, 1984)
Codification of the Law of Landlord and Tenant: Forfeiture of Tenancies (Law Commission Report No. 142, 1985)
Distress for Rent (Law Commission Consultative Document No. 97, 1986) Deeds and Escrows (Law Commission Report No. 163, 1987)
Third Report on Land Registration (Law Commission Report No. 158, 1987)
704 Bibliography
Landlord and Tenant Law: Privity of Contract and Estate (Law Commission Report No. 174, 1988)
Trusts of Land: Overreaching (Law Commission Consultative Document No. 106, 1988)
Transfer of Land: Overreaching: Beneficiaries in Occupation (Law Commission Report No. 188, 1989)
Transfer of Land: Trusts of Land (Law Commission Report No. 181, 1989) Distress for Rent (Law Commission Report No. 194, 1991)
Transfer of Land: Land Mortgages (Law Commission Report No. 204, 1991)
Transfer of Land: Obsolete Restrictive Covenants (Law Commission Report No. 201, 1991)
Sale of Goods Forming Part of a Bulk (Law Commission Report No. 215, 1993)
Landlord and Tenant Law: Termination of Tenancies Bill (Law Commission Report No. 221, 1994)
Landlord and Tenant Law: Termination of Tenancies by Physical Re-entry: A Consultative Document (Law Commission Consultative Document, January 1998)
The Execution of Deeds and Documents by or on Behalf of Bodies Corporate (Law Commission Report No. 253, 1998)
The Rule Against Perpetuities and Excessive Accumulations (Law Commission Report No. 251, 1998)
Electronic Commerce: Formal Requirements in Commercial Transactions (Law Commission, December 2001)
Limitation of Actions (Law Commission Report No. 270, 2001)
Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default (Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 174, 2004)
Law Commission and HM Land Registry, Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century: A Consultative Document (Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 252, 1998)
Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century: A Conveyancing Revolution (Law Commission Report No. 271, 2001)
Law Reform Committee, The Acquisition of Easements and Profits by Prescription (Law Reform Committee Fourteenth Report, Cmnd 3100, 1966)
Eighteenth Report on Conversion and Detinue (Cmnd 4774, 1971)
Law, John, ‘Considerations sur le numeraire et le commerce’, in E. Daire (ed.),
Economistes financiers du XVIIIe siecle (Geneva: Slatkin Reprints, 1971) Lawson, F. H., The Rational Strength of English Law (London: Stevens & Sons, 1951)
Remedies of English Law (2nd edn, London: Butterworths, 1980)
Lawson, F. H., and Rudden, B., The Law of Property (2nd edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982) The Law of Property (3rd edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002)
Libecap, G. D., ‘Contracting for Property Rights’, in T. L. Anderson and F. S. McChesney (eds.), Property Rights: Co-operation, Conflict, and Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003), p. 150
Libling, David, ‘The Concept of Property: Property in Intangibles’ (1978) 94 Law Quarterly Review 103
Locke, John, ‘On Property’, in John Locke, Second Treatise of Government (1690) Lokan, Andrew, ‘From Recognition to Reconciliation: The Functions of Aboriginal
Rights Law’ (1999) 23 Melbourne University Law Review 65
Bibliography 705
Lucy, W. N. R., and Mitchell, C., ‘Replacing Private Property: The Place for Stewardship’ (1996) Cambridge Law Journal 566
Lueck, Dean, ‘First Possession |
as the Basis of Property’, in T. L. Anderson and |
F. S. McChesney (eds.), |
Property Rights: Co-operation, Conflict, and Law |
(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003), Chapter 8
Luther, Peter, ‘William v. Hensman and the Uses of History’ (1995) 15 Legal Studies 219 Macpherson, C. B., ‘Capitalism and the Changing Concept of Property’, in E. Kamenka and R. S. Neale (eds.), Feudalism, Capitalism and Beyond (London: Edward Arnold,
1975)
‘Human Rights as Property Rights’ (1977) 24 Dissent 72
Maitland, F. W., Selected Essays (ed. H. D. Hazeltine et al., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1936)
‘The Beatitude of Seisin’ (1888) 13 Law Quarterly Review 24
Manchester, A. H., A Modern Legal History of England and Wales 1750–1950 (London: Butterworths, 1980)
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Frederick, The Communist Manifesto (ed. G. S. Jones, Penguin Classics, 1973)
Mason, J. K., and Laurie, G. T., ‘Consent or Property? Dealing with the Body and Its Parts in the Shadow of Bristol and Alder Hey’ (2001) 64 Modern Law Review 710
Matthews, Paul, ‘A Problem in the Construction of Gifts to Unincorporated Associations’ (1995) Conveyancer 302
McCay, B. J., ‘The Making of an Environmental Doctrine’, in K. Milton (ed.),
Environmentalism: The View from Anthropology (London: Routledge, 1995) McMeel, Gerard, ‘The Redundancy of Bailment’ (2003) Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial
Law Quarterly 169
McNeil, K., Common Law Aboriginal Title (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989)
Megarry, R. M., and Wade, H. W. R., The Law of Real Property (5th edn, London: Stevens and Sons, 1984)
Melville, Herman, Moby-Dick (Everyman’s Library, 1907)
Merrill, Thomas W., ‘Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Adverse Possession’ (1984–5) 79 Northwestern University Law Review 1122
‘Time, Property Rights and the Common Law: Introduction’ (1986) 64 Washington University Law Quarterly 661
(ed.), ‘Symposium: Time, Property Rights, and the Common Law: Round Table Discussion’ (1986) 64 Washington University Law Quarterly 793
Michelman, Frank, ‘Ethics, Economics and the Law of Property’, in J. Roland Pennock and J. Chapman (eds.), Nomos XXIV: Ethics, Economics and the Law (New York: New York University Press, 1982)
Mill, John Stuart, Principles of Political Economy, Book II (London: Penguin Classics, 1985) Moffat, G., Trusts Law: Texts and Materials (3rd edn, London: Butterworths, 1999) Mokal, Rizwaan Jameel, ‘The Search for Someone to Save: A Defensive Case for the
Priority of Secured Lending’ (2002) 22 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 687
‘The Floating Charge – A Eulogy’, in R. J. Mokal, Corporate Insolvency Law – Theory and Application (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), Chapter 6
706Bibliography
Mortensen, D. T., ‘Property Rights and Efficiency in Mating, Racing and Related Games’ (1982) 72 American Economic Review 968
Munzer, Stephen E., A Theory of Property (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990) Neave, M. A., Rossiter, C. J., and Stone, M. A., Sackville and Neave Property Law: Cases and
Materials (6th edn, Sydney: Butterworths, 1999)
Nolan, R. C., ‘Property in a Fund’ (2004) 120 Law Quarterly Review 108 Nozick, Robert, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974) Palmer, N. E., Bailment (2nd edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1991)
Penner, J. E., ‘The ‘‘Bundle of Rights’’ Picture of Property’ (1996) 43 UCLA Law Review 711
Perillo, Joseph, ‘The Statute of Frauds in the Light of the Functions and Dysfunctions of Form’ (1974) 43 Fordham Law Review 39
Pigou, A. C., The Economics of Welfare (London: Macmillan, 1952)
Pollock, F., and Maitland, F. W., The History of English Law (2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1898)
Pollock, F., and Wright, R. S., Possession in the Common Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1888) Posner, Richard A., Economic Analysis of Law (6th edn, New York: Aspen Publishers,
2002)
Radin, Margaret Jane, ‘Property and Personhood’ (1982) 34 Stanford Law Review 957 ‘Time, Possession, and Alienation’ (1986) 64 Washington University Law Quarterly 739 Reinterpreting Property (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993)
Reich, Charles, ‘The New Property’ (1964) 73 Yale Law Journal 733
‘Individual Rights and Social Welfare: The Emerging Legal Issues’ (1965) 74 Yale Law Journal 1245
‘Beyond the New Property: An Ecological View of Due Process’ (1990–1) 56 Brooklyn Law Review 731
Rideout, Roger, ‘The Limited Liability of Unincorporated Associations’ (1996) 49 Current Legal Problems 187
Robbins, Lionel, An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science (London: Macmillan, 1935)
Rogers, W. V. H., Winfield and Jolowicz on Tort (16th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2002) Rook, D., ‘Property Law and the Human Rights Act 1998: A Review of the First Year’
(2002) Conveyancer 316
Roper, R. B., et al., Ruoff and Roper on the Law and Practice of Registered with notes by Conveyancing (2nd looseleaf edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2003)
Rose, Carol M., ‘Possession as the Origin of Property’ (1985) 52 University of Chicago Law
Review 73
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, A Discourse on the Origins of Inequality (ed. R. D. Masters and C. Kelly, University Press of New England, 1992)
Royal Commission on Common Land, Report of Royal Commission on Common Land 1955–1958 (Cmnd 462, London: HMSO)
Rudden, Bernard, ‘Economic Theory v. Property Law: The ‘‘Numerus Clausus’’ Problem’, in J. Eekelaar and J. Bell (eds.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence: Third Series (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987), p. 239
Bibliography 707
‘Things as Thing and Things as Wealth’ (1994) 14 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 81 Ruoff, T. B. F., An Englishman Looks at the Torrens System (Sydney, Melbourne and
Brisbane, 1957)
Ryan, Alan, Property and Political Theory (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984)
Sackville, R., ‘Property Rights and Social Security’ (1978) 2 University of New South Wales Law Journal 246
‘The Emerging Australian Law of Native Title: Some North American Comparisons’ (2000) 74 Australian Law Journal 820
Sax, J. L., ‘The Public Trust Doctrine in Natural Resources Law: Effective Judicial Intervention’ (1969–70) 68 Michigan Law Review 471–566
Schwartz, A., ‘Security Interests and Bankruptcy Priorities: A Review of Current Theories’ (1981) 10 Journal of Legal Studies 1
Scott, R. E., ‘A Relational Theory of Secured Financing’ (1986) 86 Columbia Law Review 901
Seipp, D., ‘The Concept of Property in the Early Common Law’ (1994) 12 Law and History Review 29
Simpson, A. W. B., A History of the Land Law (2nd edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986) Smith, Adam, The Wealth of Nations (London: Everyman’s Library, 1991)
Sokol, Mary, ‘Bentham and Blackstone on Incorporeal Hereditaments’ (1994) 15 Legal History 287
Sreenivasan, Gopal, The Limits of Lockean Rights in Property (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)
Stevenson, Glen G., Common Property Economics: A General Theory and Land Use Applications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991)
Stillmann, Peter G., ‘Property, Freedom and Individuality in Hegel’s and Marx’s Political Thought’, in J. Roland Pennock and John Chapman (eds.), Nomos XXII: Property (New York: New York University Press, 1980), Chapter 6
Stone, Christopher, ‘Should Trees Have Standing? – Towards Legal Rights for Natural Objects’ (1972) 45 Southern California Law Review 450
Sugarman, David, and Warrington, Ronnie, ‘Telling Stories: Rights and Wrongs of the Equity of Redemption’, in J. W. Harris (ed.), Property Problems: From Genes to Pension Funds (London: Kluwer, 1997)
Swadling, W., ‘The Proprietary Effect of a Hire of Goods’, in N. Palmer and E. McKendrick (eds.), Interests in Goods (2nd edn, London, Lloyd’s of London Press, 1998), p. 491
Tawney, R. H., ‘Property and Creative Work’, in R. H. Tawney, The Acquisitive Society (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Howe, 1920)
Tehan, Maureen, ‘A Hope Disillusioned, an Opportunity Lost? Reflections on Common Law Native Title and Ten Years of the Native Title Act’ (2003) 27 Melbourne University Law Review 523
Tettenborn, A., ‘Covenants, Privity of Contract and the Purchaser of Personal Property’ (1982) Cambridge Law Journal 82
Tully, James, A Discourse on Property: John Locke and His Adversaries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980)
708 Bibliography
An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993)
Turner, Richard W., The Equity of Redemption (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1931)
Umbeck, J., ‘A Theory of Contract Choice and the California Gold Rush’ (1977) 20
Journal of Law and Economics 421
Waldron, Jeremy, The Right to Private Property (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988) Weir, Tony, A Casebook on Tort (10th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2004)
Weiss, E. B., ‘The Planetary Trust: Conservation and Intergenerational Equity’ (1983–4) 11 Ecology Law Quarterly 495–581
Whalan, D. J., ‘Title by Possession and the Land Transfer Act’ (1963) 48 New Zealand Law Journal 524
Whelan, F. G., ‘Property as Artifice: Hume and Blackstone’, in J. Roland Pennock and John Chapman (eds.), Nomos XXII: Property (New York: New York University Press, 1980), Chapter 5
White, J. J., ‘Efficiency Justifications for Personal Property Security’ (1984) 37 Vanderbilt Law Review 473
Whiteman, J., ‘Nuisance – The Environmental Tort?’ (1998) 61 Modern Law Review 870 Wu, Tang Hang, ‘The Right of Lateral Support of Buildings from the Adjoining Land’
(2002) Conveyancer 237
Zerbe, ‘Time, Property Rights, and the Common Law’ (1986) 64 Washington University Law Quarterly 793